CypherCrescent
Module 10•Unit 6 of 6•10 min

Case Study: Method Selection

In 2007, Doug Dietz, an industrial designer at GE Healthcare, watched a young girl being wheeled toward an MRI machine he had helped design. She was crying, terrified. He learned that so many children were panicked by the experience that up to 80% had to be sedated just to get a scan. Dietz had spent his career making the machine technically excellent - but the experience was broken. His choice of method determined everything that followed.

The wrong method, and the right one

An engineering (TRIZ-style) response would try to make the machine quieter or faster. Dietz realised the real problem was a human interacting with a designed system - a Design Thinking problem. He enrolled in a Design Thinking workshop and started with empathy for terrified children.

Trace the method choices

Click each step to reveal what happened.

The lesson
The same situation could be attacked with different methods - and the choice of method decided the outcome. Dietz's genius was recognising that this was a Design Thinking problem, not an engineering one. Diagnosing the problem type is the innovator's first and most important act.
Discuss

Where in your world is a broken experience being treated as an engineering problem (or vice versa)? What would change if you switched methods like Dietz did?

Try this at work this week
Take one problem your team is fighting. Write which method it truly calls for, and which method you have actually been using. If they differ, that gap may be why you are stuck.

Sources

  1. Kelley, T. & Kelley, D., Creative Confidence, 2013 (Doug Dietz / GE Adventure Series).
  2. GE Healthcare, "Adventure Series" pediatric MRI case documentation.
  3. Global Innovation Institute (GInI), Foundations of Innovation - matching methods to problems.